.jpg)
If asked what holds a democracy together, many things come to mind. However, one concept that stands out is what I learned in a civics course: "arbitration." The idea that a nation grounded in its belief in fairness and the rule of law emerges from a consensus.
In a democratic society, arbitration and arbitrariness have very different connotations, especially regarding fairness, the rule of law, and trust in institutions. Let’s break down the meanings and impacts of each:
Arbitration
- Definition: Arbitration is a process used to resolve disputes outside of courts. In arbitration, a neutral third party (the arbitrator) hears both sides and makes a binding or non-binding decision.
- Value in Democracy: In a democracy, arbitration is valued because it offers a fair, efficient, and private way to resolve conflicts. It respects individual rights, allows for voluntary agreements, and can be faster and less costly than the traditional court system.
- Impact of Ignoring Arbitration: If parties do not honor arbitration agreements, it undermines the legal system’s credibility and weakens trust in dispute resolution mechanisms. When arbitration is ignored, parties may revert to lengthy legal battles or resort to coercive tactics, leading to unrest and a lack of faith in the fairness of outcomes.
Arbitrary (Arbitrariness)
- Definition: Arbitrary decisions are made without reasonable justification or adherence to standard rules, often based on personal discretion rather than law or fairness.
- Perception in Democracies: In democratic societies, arbitrariness is generally viewed negatively because it contradicts principles of fairness and equality before the law. Democracies aim to follow consistent, transparent procedures, and arbitrary actions threaten this by introducing bias or unpredictability.
- Impact of Arbitrariness: When institutions or leaders make arbitrary decisions, it can lead to disillusionment, decreased legitimacy, and potentially protest or resistance. Arbitrary actions imply that outcomes depend on the whims of individuals rather than democratic principles, weakening democratic stability.
Summary
In short, arbitration upholds democratic values by providing a structured and fair way to resolve conflicts, while arbitrariness threatens these values by undermining trust and fairness. When arbitration agreements are not followed, it can compromise public faith in democratic processes and the rule of law.
The rule of law is a set of principles that ensure a just and orderly society by holding everyone accountable to the law. It's a fundamental part of democracy and good governance, necessary to prevent corruption, impunity, and other societal ills.
The rule of law is based on the following ideals:
- No one is above the law (recent 2024 Supreme Court rulings have challenged this principle).
- Everyone is treated equally under the law (a 2024 Supreme Court ruling has distinguished the U.S. President from everyone else).
- Everyone is held accountable to the same laws.
- There are clear and fair processes for enforcing laws.
- There is an independent judiciary.
- Human rights are guaranteed for all.
The rule of law is a core element of the United Nations' humanitarian and human rights agendas. The American Bar Association (ABA) also advocates for the rule of law.
Assessing a Country's Rule of Law
Some ways to assess a country's rule of law include:
- Are politicians and government officials held accountable for corruption?
- Do people face legal consequences for wrongdoing regardless of their wealth or status?
- Are there mechanisms in place to prevent abuses of power?
- Is the transition of power subject to the law?
Relationship Between Arbitration and Rule of Law
The rule of law is related to arbitration agreements in several ways, including:
- Governing Law: The law that governs an arbitration agreement determines its validity, scope, and other aspects. The governing law can be that of the underlying contract, the law of the arbitration's seat, or other relevant laws. This is important because it resolves disputes over the agreement.
- Choice of Law: Parties often include a "choice of law" clause in their arbitration agreement to select the law that will govern the agreement. If there’s no choice of law clause, an arbitrator will determine the applicable law.
- Enforcement: The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms.
- Mandatory Rules: In international arbitration, mandatory rules of the country where the contract obligations were performed can apply if they are considered crucial to safeguarding the country’s public interests.
The governing law of an arbitration agreement can differ from that of the underlying contract because the arbitration agreement is its own contract.
Understanding arbitration, arbitrariness, and the rule of law individually is necessary to grasp how they are interrelated and what they mean for the body of people bound by the law.